Chicken By-Products in Dog Food: What They Actually Are

The term "chicken by-products" sounds vague, industrial, and unappetizing. It's become one of the most stigmatized ingredients in pet food. But what are by-products actually? Are they fillers, waste, or something else? And should you avoid them?

🐔 Chicken By-Products Quick Facts

Aspect Details
What they are Organs, necks, feet, heads, intestines—parts not included in "chicken"
Can include Liver, heart, kidney, gizzard, spleen, lungs, necks, feet, heads
Cannot include Feathers, feces, beaks, foreign matter (per AAFCO)
Nutritional value Highly variable—organs are excellent, feet/necks are minimal
Main issue Lack of transparency—you can't tell which parts from the label

The problem: "Chicken by-products" is too vague—could be nutrient-rich liver or low-value feet

Better option: Named organs like "chicken liver" or "chicken heart" provide transparency

This guide explains exactly what chicken by-products are, why they're stigmatized, whether they're actually bad for dogs, and what to look for on labels.

What Are Chicken By-Products?

According to AAFCO (the organization that defines pet food ingredients), chicken by-products are:

"Non-rendered, clean parts of slaughtered chicken such as heads, feet, viscera, free from fecal content and foreign matter except such amounts as might occur unavoidably in good processing practices."

In simpler terms: by-products are the parts of the chicken that aren't muscle meat or skin. This includes:

What's Included in Chicken By-Products:

What's NOT Included (Per AAFCO):

The key thing to understand is that "by-products" is a catch-all term that includes both highly nutritious parts (organs like liver and heart) and less valuable parts (feet, necks). You can't tell which from the label.

Are Chicken By-Products Bad for Dogs?

The short answer: It depends entirely on which by-products are included and the quality of sourcing.

Why By-Products Aren't Inherently Bad:

Many by-products are some of the most nutrient-dense foods available:

These organs are more nutritious than plain chicken breast. Dogs in the wild eat organs first because they're instinctively drawn to nutrient density. For more on why organs are so valuable, see Why Beef Liver is One of the Best Things You Can Feed Your Dog.

Why By-Products Can Be Problematic:

The problem isn't that by-products are bad — it's that the term lacks transparency:

Chicken By-Products vs. Named Organs: The Transparency Problem

Here's the key distinction that matters for dog owners:

Transparency Makes the Difference

Ingredient Transparency Quality Signal
"Chicken liver" ✅ Clear - you know exactly what it is ✅ High - manufacturer is confident in ingredient
"Chicken heart" ✅ Clear - you know exactly what it is ✅ High - shows intentional sourcing
"Chicken by-products" ❌ Vague - could be anything ⚠️ Low - manufacturer hiding specifics
"Chicken by-product meal" ❌ Vague + rendered (heat-damaged) ❌ Very low - double red flag

Rule of thumb: If a manufacturer is using high-quality organs, they'll name them specifically. If they hide behind "by-products," they're likely using lower-value parts or don't want you to know what's included.

What Is Chicken By-Product Meal?

Chicken by-product meal is even less transparent than chicken by-products. It's by-products that have been rendered — cooked at high heat (240-290°F) to remove moisture and fat, then ground into a powder.

How By-Product Meal Differs from By-Products:

Why Rendering Matters:

Rendering concentrates protein (by-product meal is ~60-70% protein vs ~18-20% in fresh chicken), but it also:

For more on how rendering affects nutrition, see What is Meat Meal in Dog Food?

The Marketing Problem: Why By-Products Are Stigmatized

The pet food industry has successfully created a stigma around "by-products," positioning them as low-quality fillers that premium brands avoid. This marketing works because:

The Reality:

Many cultures around the world prize organs for their nutritional value. In France, pâté (liver) is a delicacy. In Asia, chicken feet are valued for collagen. The "by-product = bad" narrative is a cultural bias, not a nutritional fact.

The actual issue is transparency. If a food contains liver — great! But call it liver, not "by-products." If it contains feet — fine, but be honest about it so consumers can decide if that's what they want.

Should You Avoid Dog Food with Chicken By-Products?

Here's how to evaluate foods with by-products:

✅ When By-Products May Be Acceptable:

⚠️ When to Avoid By-Products:

✅ Better Option: Look for Named Ingredients

Instead of accepting vague "by-products," choose foods that specify exactly what organs are included:

Chicken By-Products in Dog Treats

In treats, "chicken by-products" usually refers to dehydrated or freeze-dried organs, feet, or necks. The same transparency rules apply:

✅ Good By-Product Treats:

⚠️ Lower-Value By-Product Treats:

Again: transparency is key. A treat labeled "freeze-dried chicken liver" is excellent. A treat labeled "chicken by-products" is concerning.

Whole-Food Organs vs. By-Products: The Watts Approach

At Watts, we don't use vague "by-products" terminology. We name exactly what organs we use:

These organs are technically "by-products" under AAFCO definitions, but we don't hide behind that term. We source them from grass-fed cattle, air-dry them to preserve nutrients (no high-heat rendering), and list them clearly on our label.

Why transparency matters:

Learn more about why organ-based nutrition is superior to muscle meat.

The Bottom Line on Chicken By-Products

"Chicken by-products" isn't automatically bad — some by-products (organs) are the most nutritious parts of the animal. But the term is too vague to trust.

What to do:

The real issue isn't whether something is a by-product — it's whether the manufacturer is transparent about what they're using and committed to quality sourcing.

Related Articles

What is Meat Meal in Dog Food?

Understanding rendered proteins and why transparency matters

Why Beef Liver is One of the Best Things You Can Feed Your Dog

The most nutrient-dense whole-food protein source available

Why Organ Meats Are Essential for Dogs

How organs provide nutrients muscle meat can't deliver

How to Read Dog Supplement Labels

Understanding ingredient quality and sourcing transparency

Frequently Asked Questions

What are chicken by-products in dog food?
Chicken by-products are the parts of the chicken not typically consumed by humans in Western cultures, including organs (liver, heart, kidney, spleen), necks, feet, and intestines. AAFCO defines chicken by-products as "non-rendered, clean parts of slaughtered chicken such as heads, feet, viscera, free from fecal content and foreign matter." This includes some of the most nutrient-dense parts of the animal, like liver (50x more vitamin A than muscle meat) and heart (rich in taurine and CoQ10).
Are chicken by-products bad for dogs?
No, chicken by-products are not inherently bad for dogs. Many by-products (liver, heart, kidney, gizzard) are actually more nutrient-dense than muscle meat. The issue is lack of transparency—"chicken by-products" can include highly nutritious organs or lower-value parts like feet and necks, and you can't tell which from the label. Quality varies widely between manufacturers. Premium by-products from a trustworthy source can be excellent nutrition, while low-quality by-products from unknown sources are concerning.
What is the difference between chicken and chicken by-products?
"Chicken" on a dog food label means clean muscle meat and skin, with or without bone. "Chicken by-products" means organs, feet, heads, necks, intestines, and other parts not included in the "chicken" definition. Nutritionally, some by-products (organs like liver and heart) are far superior to plain muscle meat in vitamins, minerals, and amino acids. The main difference is transparency: "chicken" is specific and clear, while "chicken by-products" is vague and could include anything from premium liver to low-value feet.
What is chicken by-product meal?
Chicken by-product meal is chicken by-products (organs, necks, feet, heads) that have been rendered—cooked at high heat (240-290°F) to remove moisture and fat, then ground into a dry powder. It's similar to chicken meal but made from by-products instead of muscle meat. Rendering concentrates protein (60-70% protein vs 18-20% in fresh chicken) but damages heat-sensitive nutrients like B vitamins and taurine. Chicken by-product meal is less transparent and generally lower quality than named organ ingredients like "chicken liver" or "chicken heart."
Why are chicken by-products cheap?
Chicken by-products are cheap because they're the parts of the chicken that Western consumers don't typically eat. In the US, people prefer boneless, skinless chicken breast, so organs, feet, necks, and heads have lower market value and are sold to pet food manufacturers at a discount. This doesn't necessarily mean by-products are low quality—many cultures prize organs for their nutritional value. The low cost reflects market demand, not inherent nutritional worth. However, the cheapness does attract manufacturers who prioritize cost-cutting over nutrition.
Are organs considered by-products?
Yes, organs like liver, heart, kidney, spleen, and gizzard are classified as by-products under AAFCO definitions because they're not muscle meat. This is one reason the by-product stigma is misleading—some of the most nutrient-dense parts of the animal (especially liver, which has 50x more vitamin A, 3000% more B12, and 12x more iron than muscle meat) are technically by-products. The issue isn't whether something is a by-product, but whether the manufacturer specifies which organs (transparent) or hides behind the vague term "by-products" (not transparent).
Is chicken liver a by-product?
Yes, chicken liver is technically a by-product since it's not muscle meat. However, when a food label lists "chicken liver" specifically (rather than "chicken by-products"), it's transparent and high-quality. Chicken liver is one of the most nutrient-dense foods available: 50x more vitamin A than muscle meat, 3000% more B12, 12x more iron, and extremely rich in folate, choline, and riboflavin. Named liver is excellent nutrition—vague "by-products" that might or might not include liver are the concern.
Should I avoid dog food with chicken by-products?
It depends on transparency and trust. Avoid foods that list vague "chicken by-products" without specifying what's included, especially from brands with poor quality reputations. Look for foods that name specific organs (chicken liver, chicken heart) instead of hiding behind generic "by-products." If a premium brand you trust lists by-products and provides transparency about sourcing, it may be fine. The issue isn't by-products themselves—it's manufacturers using the vague term to obscure low-quality ingredients.
What are chicken by-products used for in dog treats?
In dog treats, chicken by-products often refer to dehydrated or rendered organs, feet, necks, or cartilage. Some by-product treats are excellent: dehydrated chicken liver, heart, or gizzard are nutrient-dense and dogs love them. Others are low-value: chicken feet or necks provide collagen but little else. The problem is the label "chicken by-products" doesn't tell you which parts you're getting. Look for treats that specify the ingredient: "freeze-dried chicken liver" is transparent and trustworthy, while "chicken by-products" is vague and concerning.
Why do premium dog foods avoid by-products?
Premium dog foods often avoid the term "by-products" for marketing reasons, not nutritional ones. The pet food industry has successfully stigmatized by-products as "fillers" or "waste," so premium brands avoid the term to appeal to consumers—even though many by-products (organs) are nutritionally superior to muscle meat. Instead, premium brands list specific organs like "beef liver," "chicken heart," or "turkey gizzard" rather than using the catch-all term "by-products." This provides transparency and avoids the negative association, even though these named organs are technically by-products.